GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB THROUGH CHIEF SECRETARY, LAHORE versus CH. ABDUL SATTAR HANS
Discrimination in the Arts 3 and 25 Civil Service Senior Rating Auditor's Department Senior Auditors (BPS 16) [Federal Government Employees] Deputy Accountants employed by the Provincial Government (BPS 14) [Provincial Government Employees] The question is, if both sets of employees are performing the same type of duties, they should receive the same persons and permits when the Provincial Services Tribunal found that federal government employees and provincial government employees are of the same type. If performing the duties, they should receive the same stamps and permits. That if federal government employees and provincial government employees are given two different pay scales, that could be equivalent to removing wages and exploitation under Article 3 of the Constitution, and that even though the provincial government would have to bear the additional financial burden. But financial constraints on the legality of the service structure and constitution cannot stand, neither the service tribunal nor any other government official has undertaken any exercise which shows that the work is being carried out by senior auditors of the department. The work was exactly as it was being done. By a deputy accountant employed in the province. Secondly, Article 3 of the Constitution had no application in the present case because the deputy accountants employed by the provincial government voluntarily joined the service and accepted their terms and conditions of service, and they were not responsible for the federal government. The senior auditors did not compete. Therefore, they could not claim to be given permission and opportunities because senior auditors of the federal government's deputy accountants who work in the province
