Find a Lawyer

SHAH NAWAZ KHAN AND SONS versus GOVERNMENT OF N.-W.F.P.

Section 107 (1) (b) and 100 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 37 (d) and 185 Appeals Decision on Appeals Decision Remand Case Scope Appellate High Court's impugned order under which the High Court obtained regular remand. The dismissal of the appeal was made in the trial court about the appellant that before this case the case was remanded twice and now it is remanded in the trial court for the third period of the trial. What is being done, this record makes it clear that both sides are aware of their own position. Their requests are highlighted and The evidence also emerged in addition to the light. Therefore, there was no justification for sending the trial to the trial court for the third period of the trial. The Supreme Court observed that the High Court had all the material to decide on a regular first appeal, putting aside the High Court's unwanted order. Appeal was allowed by the High Court on a regular basis to decide the first appeal

Related judgments — Supreme Court, 2015

• Mst. FATEH BIBI v. KHIZAR HAYAT 2015 SCMR 907
• The PROVINCE OF PUNJAB through Collector, Sialkot v. FEROZ DIN 2015 SCMR 909
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. UNITED BANK LIMITED 2015 SCMR 911
• GOVERNMENT OF THE PUNJAB through Chief Secretary, Lahore v. Ch. ABDUL SATTAR HANS 2015 SCMR 915
• GHULAM FAROOQ v. State 2015 SCMR 948
• COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, COMPANY ZONE, ISLAMABAD v. MUSLIM COMMERCIAL BANK LTD. 2015 SCMR 950
• SHER BAHADUR v. FAYYAZ 2015 SCMR 955
• GOVERNMENT OF KHYBER PAKHTUNKHWA v. MUHAMMAD JAVED 2015 PLC(CS) 962

All Supreme Court judgments of 2015 →

famous lower court advocate from Chacklala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes