Article 185 (3) pension increase, entitled to the former employees (applicants) of the plaintiff bank, who retired before his privatization, claimed that he was entitled to increase his pension according to the terms of the bank's privatization agreement. Are. The privatization agreement related to the increase in pensions was applied only to employees / staff who were in service at the time of the privatization agreement, and not to former employees who retired before the privatization agreement. Applicants retired long ago The bank's privatization agreement for bank privatization provided some protection with regard to the benefits and facilities available to bank employees / staff, who were in service at the time of the privatization agreement. Did not cover / protect it. We claim employment pension benefits, which were retired during the period prior to the privatization agreement, may have anyone sympathizing with applicants for modest pension benefits, at this time of high living costs, But that alone was not enough to justify them getting rid of pension benefits. Accordingly, he was expelled and denied leave
