C.M.A. NO. 3854 OF 2014 IN SUO MOTU CASE NO.3 OF 2009 versus
CH XII & R 134 Rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, O IV Constitution of Pakistan, Article 184 (3) One of the parties in the petition filed by the corporate body confirming the judge's bias before the court before the court , A corporate body, filed a petition before the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, stating that one of the judges of the Supreme Court, who is currently hearing the present case, has already made up his mind about some aspects of the case. That was filed. The request was merely a corporate entity and had no mind of its own, nor could it be suspected of its corporate existence. It is only acted upon by natural persons such as its directors, chief executives, etc., so the corporate entity The lawyer representing you must explain. While the court was concerned about who it feared and on what basis Prima was facing, there were some significant violations of the rules of the Supreme Court, 1980, and the Code of Conduct. In the present case, in such clear violations credited to legal practice and advocates under the Bar Council Act 1973, a lawyer retains the dignity and superiority of his profession, as well as his position as a member. Including violations. Order accordingly
