MUHAMMAD AMIN CHAPAL versus KARACHI CANTONMENT BOARD THROUGH CANTONMENT EXECUTIVE OFFICER
Sections 184 and 185 of the Special Relief Act (Constitution of 1877), Section 42 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 25 Law Reforms Act (II of 1972), Section 3 Intra-Court Amended Building Project Deviation, Disapproval of Equal Treatment, Discrimination The plaintiff's claim for the right to complain was that the authorities did not approve the revised building plan presented to him and refused to regularize the illegal construction and deviation, which accepted the compliance fee of the authorities. It was believed that the claimant's claim was rejected as an example, so that potential buildings could be revoked in the future. Regarding the scheme of validation, the authorities acknowledge that similar deviations were regularized using the discretion provided under Sections 184 and 185 of the Cantonment Act, 1924, the High Court accepted the confession of those powers. Was used under the law at its discretion. There was no foul play and plaintiff singing without any prior notice or policy. There was no law, by-law, or policy of the Cantonment Board that could define the parameters and the extent of deviations in the approval scheme under which the Cantonment Act 1924 Sections 184 and 185 of the Act should not be followed regularly. The High Court refused to support any violation of any law, regulation and regulation by regulating any illegal construction and deviation by accepting the powers, structure fees, under section I84 and 185 of the Cantonment Act 1924, Approved deviations in approved building plans, refuses to approve and regulates deviations. However, likewise
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
