MUHAMMAD HASEEB KHAN versus THE STATE THROUGH FIA CBC, KARACHI
Sections 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 409, 420, 468, 471 and 477 A / 34 of the Corruption Prevention Act (II of 1947), Section 5 (2) of the Bank (Special Courts) Ordinance (IX of 1984) ), Section 5 (6), criminal breach of trust by public servants, fraud, fraud, forgery of fake documents, account and fraudulent documents, denial of income tax money and withholding of motor vehicle tax Taxes were collected by excise. The department tax, which was received by the accused during the day, was to be transferred to the National Bank around 6 pm this evening, with a risky amount of Rs 261,411,407 of the total amount deposited in the bank. The two accused were included in the FIR with specific roles by the accused persons, the accused did not refuse to sign the computer-generated invoices and 71 paid challan, of which the government treasury ever Was not transferred to the accused person, the court in Chalan granted the bail of one of the co-accused, Qom was not abuse, while FIA was assigned a specific role in building the two accused, in these circumstances, I can not guarantee claim on the basis of the principle of the rule. On the basis of reasonable grounds to believe that the two accused had committed the crime by accusing themselves and that they had damaged the state treasury, the plea filed by the accused was dismissed,
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
