Article 142 of the Special Relief Act (I of 1877) was decided together with the suit for the possession of section 8 immovable property. The defendant's claim was that he had acquired the suit property in 1978 while the plaintiff filed a lawsuit that year. 2000; and therefore, under Article 142 of the Limitation Act 1908. The trial was time-barred. The dispute in favor of the defendants was misconstrued because in 1978 the defendant was to occupy the year as a friendly gesture with the consent of the owner or otherwise but there was no cause for bodily harm (giving reasons) (Filing a lawsuit for the defendant to take possession of the defendant) and such situation continued until the entire relationship between the parties in all matters relating to the property and its possession was terminated. Has been done Closed the continuation of the allegedly unlawful occupation, if any, and the defendant was involved in the occupation under an alleged sale agreement and the previous period of unlawful occupation, as was the defense claim in that claim, stood. And was the latest cause of action. The appeal was dismissed when the defendant approached the plaintiff to stand trial
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
