OV, R 20, O VIII, R 13 & O XXII, R 4 (3) The Special Relief Act (I of 1877), Sections 42 and 54, the death of the respondent's legal representative, the enforcement of it after the death of the defendant The step-by-step son of the defendant refused to be the defendant on the basis that he was not the legal representative of the deceased defendant and / or was not the legal representative of the defendant, Was available on record after The stepchild will continue to show the willingness of the step-son to be a defendant such legal representatives will be made defendants in the case as the terms of the OVIII, R 13 CPC, if not strictly, at least It had addresses to comply with. And other details of legal representatives, which may be tried a little, may always remain, the right to defend such legal representatives, with full justice, will not be removed merely because the list of legal representatives of fraud. Ed's defendant, who was available on file records, does not appear at the trial of O. VIII, R13CPC plaintiff, and the deceased plaintiff's step-son, in the first instance, seeking details and / or addresses of legal representatives. Are. Serve the defendants and then serve them, and in the event of failure, such legal representatives may always be offered through alternative service. The High Court, along with the plaintiff, directed the deceased plaintiff's step-son to seek the details of the facts of the legal representatives. The defendant's High Court further directed that in the event of failure, legal representatives were served through an alternative service under OV
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
