Section 5, Schedule Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Constitutional Request for Increase of Rehabilitation Allowance The wife moved the application for increase in the maintenance allowance which was rejected by the Family Court but the Appellate Court increased it to Rs 1,500 per child per month. With the increase of 10% from the date of filing of the application with each person, the husband argued that the appellate court's maintenance allowance did not have any annual increase and the husband went abroad. And he was getting paid. Accordingly, the cost of basic necessities of life, as well as school fees, had changed after the provision of care allowance after a gap of four years, the father's responsibility for the child's needs / expenses was financial. And the status quo was justified. Evidence of such evidence being presented in the form of financial aid statistics / statistical data in defendant's annual annuity care allowance may be presented, without any facts, criteria or justification for the annual increase in maintenance allowance. Was made for reasons, the restitution allowance was a disallowed, unlawful and serious decision and the appellate court's approval of the annual increase in restitution allowance was set aside and the order was amended accordingly. However, the increase in the monthly maintenance allowance was maintained Constitutional application was dismissed Accordingly
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
