Section 24 of the Punjab Rented Primes Act (VII, 2009), constitution of section 15 and 22 of Pakistan, Article 10 The rent tribunal scope was formally filed in the tenants requesting the removal of the tenants, which was rejected by the district. Concerning the tenants, the judge said that the rent tribunal had been discriminated against. The applicants had alleged that the rent tribunal had bias me by dismissing their requests that the rental tribunal was not sufficient to establish a bias of mutual plea against the applicants. Were able to review the petitions nothing was on record to show that the orders on the petitions were approved with Malala or the wrong order granted by the court for consideration was based on prejudice. Applicants were not able to attribute the bias. In order to demonstrate that the principles of natural justice were violated, the process needed to be urgently executed in the removal tribunal application by the Rent Tribunal. The brief's suspension was presumably because of the prejudice that the immediate action could not provide for the reason for the transfer of the withdrawal request, and the district judge legalized the invalid order. Jurisdiction Exercise No jurisdiction error, fact or legal weakness or irregularity found Modification rejected
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
