Sections 4 (c) and 221 Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302 (b), 392, 396 and 411 murder of robber, robbery, receiving stolen property under section 302 The petition for, was filed by the PPC on the basis that the applicant / accused, on the basis of the post mortem report as well as the forensic histopathology report, the charge under section 302, the PPC was not excluded. The suspect had filed a review request, was 80 years old, and witnesses saw the applicant / defendant leave the house, which was later identified in a test identification parade court. Was, under the circumstances, charged under Section 302 (b), PPC, if charged under Section 392, PPC by the Area Magistrate; and consequently Section 2 b2 (b). OR 6, PP, if the offense under PPC was proved, the matter will be sent to the court session only under section 2b (b), PPC, and the court will not make it compulsory. Section 2302 (b), irrespective of insufficient evidence required to convict the applicant under PPC, Section 2302, Material opinion in the form of an FIR filed under PPC, Identity Parade, etc. Section 2302 (B) was sufficient to charge the accused. PPC
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015