ATHAR HUSSAIN KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH PRINCIPAL SECRETARY
The Central Selection Board proposes to promote quality integrity, general dignity and affirmative discrimination, with the purpose of promoting the Arts 199 and 212 Federal Service Tribunals Act (LXX of 1973), Section 4 constitutional civil service. But the competent authority reconsidered their cases. The integrity, general credibility and effectiveness of the applicants, was that the applicants were treated with discrimination and that the qualities of honesty, common credibility and impression were not a standard of purpose for which they refused to advertise. It could have been promoted by the Central Selection Board and was recommended to fulfill the standard for the same purpose. Applicants' names were provided in the list of proposed employees for promotion; if any employee is under consideration, good reputation and influence were among the five numbers that received fewer than three numbers, written by the Central Election Board. Will be deferred or dismissed for reasons such as recordings. If an employee had obtained three marks, he should be awarded five points for the purpose of the overall objective set before the competent authority. According to the marks for applicants for the integrity, general credibility and impression characteristics were five Because they had obtained the three numbers, no specific information was available to the competent authority on the basis of which it could be concluded that the Central Selection Board did not consider the applicant's issues of integrity, common reputation and credibility as appropriate. Neglecting authority could not take applicant's case seriously on this basis.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
