EHALWAN GOTH WELFARE COUNCIL versus DISTRICT CO-ORDINATION OFFICER (DCO), KARACHI
Sections 151, O IX, RR 8 and 9 Limitation Act (IX of 1908), Arts, 163 and 181 Civil Procedure Code (Amendment) Ordinance (X of 1980), Section 15 High Court Appeal suit not yet settled Application 9 under IX, R, CPC was dismissed for illegal prosecution The restoration of such litigation request raised by the plaintiff was when the case was dismissed for illegal prosecution. If so, it was set aside for the decision of the petition, not for matters, evidence or otherwise the central case hearing. , It cannot be ruled out for illegal prosecution. When the matter was settled for hearing of the petition, the court could only appear on such request, as neither the case nor the case was decided to settle the matter. The plaintiff and such case were settled for evidence. In these cases the limits of illegal prosecution cannot be ruled out, where the grounds of order cannot be retained and cannot be treated as an order under O IX, R 8, restoration of CPC The application will be subject to Section 151 CPC and not. TIOX, R9, resided under CPC and Article 181 of the Limitation Act, 1908, and Article 163 of the Limitation Act, 1908, dismissed the order to dismiss the case for illegal prosecution. And restored the case. In the original stage the appeal of the High Court was allowed, in the circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
