Section 8 of the plaintiff's view for possession of immovable property was that the certification sold in favor of the defendants was illegal, invalid, and ineffective against its rights. The suit was rejected simultaneously, alleging that the purchase was made through fraudulent and inappropriate games. At any time, there would be a new reason for the admission process in any way in the record of income, the present case could not be considered in the statement of the witness within time alone, but on the cumulative effect of the entire statement by the court. Had to be considered. The language was punished for disorderly / speechlessness The court had to imagine and evaluate the witness's truthfulness, ability and mental level and should not expect and test the average person with good, written, outright answers. Who didn't have to face difficult, sudden, and complicated things. Questions The court should focus on the theme and substance of the statement and not to offset the election mark. The sale of the CE was confirmed by fraud and neither the actual sales benefit was prepared by the individuals. Nor was any certified or photocopy of it presented in secondary evidence, and oral claims in connection with the sale could not be dismissed because it was said that the document was not. During the trial before the witnesses, the witnesses were presented: The beneficiary for sale failed to present the so-called author who wrote the deed of sale illegally, and the Revenue Officer confirming the registration of such evidence. Was stopped by the defendants in which Chief
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
