Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

MUHAMMAD MUMSHAD NADEEM versus STATE


Section (a) (vi) Criminal Code (v. 1898), Section 342 Corruption and Corruption Procedure, Abuse of Evidence Statement of the Defendants Under Section 342, CCPC fails to present all perpetual evidence, to the accused. The trial court sentenced and sentenced them - the trial of the accused by the accused for corruption and corruption was that they had all the evidence of the prosecution against them under Section 234 Cr, CR. The statements were not put under the PC and the documents were confirmed by the trial court under such documents. A portion of the evidence termed the accused's case biased and that such error was irregular, which could have led to the trial. The High Court set aside the sentence and sentence imposed on the accused and the trial court Was remanded to re-record the statements of the accused. According to the law, the decision to appeal was allowed in the circumstances.

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Musakhel lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.