NATIONAL ELECTRIC POWER REGULATORY AUTHORITY versus FAISALABAD ELECTRIC SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED
Sections 12, 7, 3 and 5 of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Tariff Standards and Procedures) Rules, 1998, R16 (6) Law Reform Ordinance (XII of 1972), Section 3 Constitution of Pakistan, Article 199 Int. Price, the authority of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (authority) to determine or amend the rates The decision on a motion for the departure of the authority which mandates the completion of the mandatory and basic functions / duties of section 5, 3 Interpretation ()) Regulation of Generation Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 scope appellant, National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (ATA) T) passed the controversial order in the constitutional petition, under which the authority to review leave on leave was set aside the entire power of the authority under the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (tariff standards and R 16 (6)). And the Regulation, Rule 1998 meant that five members of the Authority (Nepra), including the Chairman, were held that the full power under R16 (6) of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Tariff Standards and Procedures) Rules, 1998 It was not a power available but a legal force, such as under Section 3 of the Regulation of Generation, Transmission and Distribution of Electric Power Act, 1997 Was provided, which consisted of five members, including a chairman, because under the said role the authority relinquished one of them. The rules of Rule 16 (6) of the National Electric Power Regulatory Authority (Tariff Standards and Procedures) Rules 1998 only made it clear that the authority had to work with full force in matters that fall into the basic and essential functions of the authority. ? Where delegation was not allowed and review
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
