AFSHI IBRAHIM versus DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KHANEWAL
Section 2 and 32 Punjab Educators Recruitment Policy, 2012 Notification No. SO (SE IV) 2 43/2011 Dated 5 6 2012 Constitution of Pakistan, Arts 199 and 4 Constitutions Civil Service Appointment on the order of the Punjab Ombudsman of the Punjab Teachers Not Applicable Recruitment Policy, 2012 Applicant, pursuing advertisement for the post of Educator and stood on Serial No 29 of Merit List, three out of sixteen posts could not be filled. Selected his appointment, 2012, in which it was pledged to fill the still filled positions with these candidates first. Was submitted to the merit list, which was finalized in 2011. The bus was lost and could not benefit from the recruitment policy as no one was vacant, the petitioner submitted a petition to the PR office. The Oriental Ombudsman, which was accepted by the same authority, submitted a representation to the Governor under section 32 of the Punjab Office of the Ombudsman Act 1997, which was dismissed, therefore, the Authority filed a review request and it was also rejected. Done. That no review was provided under the law that the applicant's position was that the Punjab Educators Recruitment Policy, 2012 notification on the order of the Provincial Ombudsman was not being implemented by false advertisement and misinterpretation, According to which the valid notification regarding the Punjab Educators Recruitment Policy, 2012 was valid. Considered by the Provincial Ombudsman, but it did not go without construction
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
