MOAR THROUGH LEGAL HEIR versus MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH HYDERABAD
Section 10 of the Special Relief Act (in 1877), Sections 42 and 54 of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), AXLI, R31 grant permanently prohibited in the grant of a state land upon the termination of the plaintiff's permanent term. Claims to be announced and permanent ban were filed. The question was set aside for disposal of litigation / minor threats, but the colonial officers assigned various persons among the parties on a permanent settlement and the plaintiff / grantee surrendered in favor of the plaintiff and later The plaintiff was quietly enjoying possession of the suit land by a legally approved authority, but nearly 18 years later, the Member Board of Revenue granted the plaintiff without the opportunity to be heard. The trial court granted the plaintiff's permission to take further action in the officer cleared the land and directed the Colonization Officer. Dismissed the trial case and also dismissed the appeal against the trial court's decision. Instead, the appellate court reiterated the issues raised by the trial court appellate court instead of specifying the points for determination even though the landlord's approval was granted. , But only confirmed this order without checking evidence or a policy document. Member, according to the Board of Revenue that the land is in the 20 chains of the village and was also disposed of against the land grant policy, the appeal decision did not say that the appellate court had given the legal status, justification and ownership of the involuntary decision. The verdict has been set aside and the matter was remanded to the appellate court after hearing by the parties.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
