Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 420 / 489F / 506/34 Delivery of fraudulent and dishonest property, issuing a check with dishonesty, criminal threatening guarantee, being the sole proprietor of the company Denial of denial. Check the release of the co-accused when the accused on bail was granted bail by the trial court which was rejected by the court on the petition moved by the complainant under section 497 (5), the CRPC accused claimed. He is not the sole owner of the company who issued the dishonest scrutiny nor was he going to sign the check but in the previous civil suit the accused has declared himself the sole owner of the company and the co-accused (son of the accused) The accused has been referred to as the national tax number's mortgage and guarantors. The NTN also confirmed the suspect, saying that he was the sole owner of the company regarding the delay in filing the FIR, as the documents filed by the complainant were sufficient to disregard it. In the delay, the accused and the accused were absconding for years and after being granted bail in the case, the accused participant misappropriated the bail discount and was found guilty and was convicted and released on bail. It appears that the accused was habitual. In the past, several other checks were issued for the offender and dishonestly, who were dishonored on the offer for which the accused was sentenced to three years imprisonment and as part of his Section 497 prohibition. C was not attracted but that is the view of the accused. And in relation to crimes that are affecting a large number of people, it does not deserve to be guaranteed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
