Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASEEN versus STATE

Section 497 Preventive Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 324, 337H (2), 114, 148 and 149 Convicted AMD, attempted, bail, FIR, for speedy and negligent act of wounding Denied, I was filed immediately by the complainant stating all the facts, in which two innocent persons lost their lives and two witnesses of the prosecution were injured; , Came under the CRPC prohibition clause and the defendant failed to sue. The request for bail was rejected

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• NOOR ALI v. State 2012 YLR 883
• HAFEEZULLAH v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Irrigation and Power Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi 2012 PLC(CS) 889
• Ms. FATIMA v. PRINCIPAL AND CHAIRMAN ADMISSION COMMITTEE, GHULAM MUHAMMAD MAHAR MEDICAL COLLEGE, SUKKUR 2012 MLD 891
• SHAMAAL KHAN SHAH v. State 2012 PCrLJ 897
• HABIB JUTE MILLS LTD. v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary, Finance Department Sindh Secretariat, Karachi 2012 PTD 901
• EMAN TEXTILE MILL v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Power and Irrigation Sindh 2012 MLD 902
• WAJID ALI v. State 2012 PCrLJ 909
• MOAR through Legal Heir v. MEMBER BOARD OF REVENUE, SINDH HYDERABAD 2012 CLC 912

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

criminal advocate from Chacklala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes