Find a Lawyer

AHSAN versus STATE

Sections 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 302, 506 (2), 504 and 34 of Kotal Amad, criminal threat and deliberate contempt of joint intent, even though the grant of one of the defendants was armed with a weapon at the scene, But no clear action was yet to be taken into account. It was yet to be decided in the trial whether the provisions of section 34, PPC, would be drawn in the circumstances of the case or the accused was not admitted on bail, Under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MUHAMMAD BABER v. State 2012 MLD 707
• MUJEEBUR REHMAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Education, Education Department, Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 708
• ALL PAKISTAN MUSLIM LEAGUE v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2012 CLC 714
• SYNERGY ADVERTISING (PVT.) LIMITED v. ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPER SOCIETY through Executive Director 2012 CLC 721
• PAKISTAN STEEL MILLS CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE (LEGAL DIVISION), KARACHI 2012 PTD 723
• MUHAMMAD AZEEM alias DODO KATOHAR v. State 2012 YLR 724
• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2012 MLD 731
• RAB NAWAZ v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION, DAHARKI 2012 MLD 736

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates phone number from Sargodha lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes