Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD BABER versus STATE

Section 497 (2) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), section 392/34 robbery bail, further investigation name, holia or any particulars of the accused were not mentioned in the FIR. The identification of the accused was not held before the Judicial Magistrate, in which the accused's name was not listed, no FIR was registered in the case of further investigation of the accused. Under the circumstances, the bail was filed

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ZEESHAN AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 700
• MUHAMMAD HAFEEZ v. BANKING COURT NO.1, KARACHI 2012 CLD 701
• HABIB BANK LIMITED v. Syed JAFFAR ABBAS 2012 CLC 704
• BADSHAH alias MUHAMMAD SALEH v. State 2012 YLR 705
• MUJEEBUR REHMAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Education, Education Department, Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 708
• ALL PAKISTAN MUSLIM LEAGUE v. GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2012 CLC 714
• SYNERGY ADVERTISING (PVT.) LIMITED v. ALL PAKISTAN NEWSPAPER SOCIETY through Executive Director 2012 CLC 721
• AHSAN v. State 2012 MLD 723

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

jobs for fresh advocates from Swabi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes