Clause 302/149 Benefits of Delinquent Evidence The Benefit of Doubt The Trial Was Not Free From Reasonable Suspicion Prosecutors failed to explain how, when the weapons of crime were dispatched to the Ballistic Division, there was enmity between the complainant and the accused. And the victim was described as a "cargo" in some "Faisal" by a well-to-do complainant, and he had earlier improved his version by stating that he had arrived at the scene after hearing the shootings and It contradicted itself by saying that the accused had fired at the victim in his presence. The presence of two women was also found at the scene of the incident and the post-mortem report at the time of filing of the FIR showed some injuries to be blackened and grazed, according to a statement, of the 10 speeding on the victim. Fire shots were fired at a distance. Could not replace this place with black and charging. The material witnesses of the trial were not examined by the prosecution, of which no plausible explanation was available; in view of such contradictions, the corrections and other briefs were not free from reasonable doubt that the benefit should be given to the accused, This decision, not as a matter of grace, but as a matter of rights, was controversial. Set aside by the trial court, the accused was acquitted and released \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
