The complaint regarding the applicant's jurisdiction for the registration of the Justice for Justice section 22A and 561 was that he moved the application under Section 22A, CRPC and contacted the Justice of Peace so that They could get the relevant Section H guidance. FIR, but was denied the direction of filing a complaint directly. An anonymous order indicated that the applicant's request was rejected on two grounds. Firstly, Section HA stated in its report that the applicant's nephew was involved in a criminal offense for which an FIR was registered and that the applicant sought revenge under Section 22A, CRPC. To take the outgoing application, and another on a respondent basis. In the argument that the FIR was being tried to register financially with the intention of harassing police officers for discharging their legal duties, even if the request was legally executed. Or it can be verified only after recording the complainant's statement. This report could not be considered by the police as the only criteria for passing judgment on the jurisdiction of justice as it was to know that the police personnel who are bound to record the statement under section 154, CR PC. Refused to fulfill its obligation The affected order was set aside and Section HA was directed to record the applicant's statement and, if there was any identifiable case, Dout worked according to law. The request to be dealt with accordingly \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
