Find a Lawyer

YASEEN versus STATE

Section 497 Bail Prevention, Impact of the Principles of Law and Courts Extravagant Regulations and some of the usual rights granted by the court, unambiguously significant fugitives are guaranteed to a person despite the merits of this case. The rule is that the accused fails his investigation by his conduct, in which valuable evidence (such as recovery, etc.) is simply lost or impossible to collect (by his conduct). Cannot seek retaliation for such act after (in breach of the law)

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• ABDUL AZIZ v. State 2012 MLD 731
• RAB NAWAZ v. S.H.O., POLICE STATION, DAHARKI 2012 MLD 736
• NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN v. WHITE GOLD EXPORTERS (PVT.) LTD. 2012 CLD 746
• Hafiz AHMED BUX v. State 2012 YLR 747
• GHULAM ABBAS v. DILSHAD AHMED 2012 CLC 754
• IMRAN MEHMOOD v. State 2012 PCrLJ 757
• BASHIR AHMED alias BASHOO v. State 2012 YLR 759
• Mst. GULNAZ v. Mst. AMINA 2012 CLC 761

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

immigration advocates contact from Tank lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes