Sections 302, 324, 353, 393, 397 and 34 of Khattal, attempt to commit murder, assault or criminal force, to commit a robbery, robbery or robbery to prevent a public servant from discharging his duties. The incident occurred during the day and the complainant has looked closely at the two accused, the name of the other witnesses of the prosecution was not questioned by mistake, although it was not mentioned in the FIR, but being a travel agency employee. And, the complainant's brother, their presence at the scene of the incident was undoubtedly natural, evidence of the prosecution's FIR Contact There is no contradiction, the accused was alleged to have opened fire their weapons. And the complainant and the accused were injured in the fire, therefore, both the accused were equally responsible for committing the crime in terms of Section 34, PPC, irrespective of whether the accused and the accomplice were involved in the incident. How the suspects participated. The crime of committing a robbery during which a person loses his life. And the other injured were equally liable to be treated in the same manner with both the accused and under this offense the offender, irrespective of his role in the incident / offense, was fugitive and, after that incident, Sec. 87 Sec and 88 was declared a fugitive after initiating proceedings under 88, the CCP and such detainees of the accused arrested after a long period of time appeared deliberately and knowingly and were the nephew of the co-accused. Because of this, he could not claim that he was unaware of the FIR's registration and requested the trial family to file a case against him. D
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
