Section 497 of the Criminal Procedure (XLY of 1860), Section 302/34 assertion of a noble, joint intention guarantee, denied the allegations against the accused that they had been killed due to allegations of marriage of the accused due to certain marital affairs. Son of the slaughter). The persons were that there was a delay of seven days in recording the complainant's further statements and a sixteen day delay in recording the statements of witnesses under Section 6464, CRPC, and that is the case of two current cases. Under his statement 16 164, the CCPC stated that the defendants gave several blows to the deceased Medical evidence suggests that the deceased received five wounds, therefore, there is no contradiction between the eye and the medical evidence. Was. The two versions are not the case because the complainant of the FIR was not an eyewitness to the incident and he merely stated that when he heard his son's cry, he arrived there on the occasion he saw his son on the ground. The suspect was found lying, while prosecution witnesses said they were clearly informed of the delay in filing the FIR as the FIR was taken to the hospital after the deceased's death. Post-mortem was performed and burial could not be performed post mortem and burial without informing the police and even the deceased's posterity. The teardown report clearly indicated that her body was taken to the hospital. A police officer dismissed the bail plea of the accused in these circumstances
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
