SAJID BROTHERS & CO. THROUGH PROPRIETOR versus MANAGER, ALLIED BANK LIMITED
Appeal to retain Constitution Pakistan, Section 199 Constitutional petition has passed the banking court's order under which the respondents' names in the case under section 22 of the Financial Affairs (Rehabilitation Finance) Ordinance 2001 Were excluded Sadly, the appeal of a judgment by a banking court against a decision, decree, sentence or final order, but it appeals against the order of the banking court to accept or reject the leave application to defend any arbitrary order, The review did not provide a review, which did not resolve the entire matter before the Banking Court. In the present case, the Banking Court decided to request leave to defend the case and, in doing so, from the list of defendants. The names of the respondents were excluded. Order was expressly prohibited by law, therefore, there was no warrant for entertaining the constitutional petition and the de-moing would cause frustration and disappointment of the law because the constitutional petition was not enforceable. Done
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
