FAQEER MUHAMMAD ALIAS HAFIZULLAH JAMALI versus STATE
Sections 242424/3 353/1111 public To prevent a public servant from performing his duties, committing murder, MD, assault or criminal force, receiving stolen property fraudulently, accusing him of unnatural and untrustworthy incident, receiving a ballistic report Failure to do so and the accomplices (appellants) were alleged to have snatched a motorcycle, after which the police identified them on a leash and the policy was intended to kill the accused accused at trial. The firing on the party had started and the accused and the accused were sentenced under section 324. , 353 and 411, the PPC convictions of the accused and co-accused were such that despite cross-firing with sophisticated weapons, neither party suffered any scratches. That they were identified in Street Light. The person who was stripped of his motorcycle was not tested at the time of the investigation. Arrivals and departure entries were not submitted to the trial court, and the allegedly recovered firearms and vacant space were not sent to the ballistic expert for report. Neither the policemen nor the police vehicle were harmed. The police had reportedly received information from the police for allegedly snatching a motorcycle, therefore, it should have been included as the arrival of advisers from the area's independent persons and the trial court Departure entries were not presented to the arms and ammunition. A ballistic expert was not sent for the report, the investigating officer admitted that the firearms and bullets were not sealed on the spot. The investigating officer located the area despite hotels, houses and mosques near it
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
