Sections 497 (2) Control of Narcotic Substances (XXV of 1997), Sections 6, 7, 8 and 9 (C) of the Customs Act (IV of 1969), Sections 155A, 155B, 155D, 79 and 80 and The benefit of the suspicion of smuggling drug bail, further investigation, the suspect and his firm did not appear in the FIR petitioner and his firm is not a registered importer within the meaning of sections 155A, 155B and 155D of the Customs Act 1969 Was. Neither the defendant nor his firm were on active taxpayers' Federal Federal Board of Revenue List and was not entitled to enter / file any bill of entry, no one to indicate the accused's name as the container importer The import manifesto was not filed or any other document within the meaning of sections 79 and 80 of the Customs Act 1969 was filed by the accused or his firm shipping documents as well as clearing and forwarding the shipment documents to the port. , Did not have the name of the accused or allegedly involved in a series of alleged import booking verification documents I did not include the name of his firm, the accused, the alleged alleged cocaine was not recovered from the physical possession of the accused, nor was there any explicit attempt to seize the container mentioned in the original bill of lading container. Ownership was not available to be disclosed, nor is there any other import document in the record which shows that it is the accused or his firm. The commission of the crime had information on the importer or the alleged goods to establish an alliance with the accused; some irregularities in the case of prosecution require further investigation. Any credible or concrete evidence against the accused and his firm. Diarrhea
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
