Find a Lawyer

MST. FARZANA versus MST. SEHTI

Sections 139, 140, 141 and 142 Distribution proceedings Option to pay any amount through Revenue Officer's compensation Scope Revenue Officer acting as a civil jurisdiction of a competent jurisdiction in respect of title only in the property to be distributed. I could decide for myself, but I couldn't. All other questions falling within the jurisdiction of the Civil Court Revenue Officer shall be decided by the manner in which the property is distributed or the division of the division will decide whether it will act as a Revenue Officer only, but the revenue or court of the court. Not as a Revenue Officer while not doing so. Providing compensation to the parties / parties with any amount, which will be required by a civil court of competent jurisdiction due to the nature of the dispute.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• SAJID HUSSAIN v. SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY, KHAIRPUR 2012 PLD 232
• Mir IFTIKHAR AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 235
• SULTAN MURAD v. State 2012 MLD 235
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. PLASTIC PACK (PVT) LIMITED 2012 CLD 239
• SONO v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Chief Secretary Government of Sindh 2012 PLC(CS) 249
• NIAMATULLAH KHAN v. THE STATE through Anti-Narcotics Force, Sindh 2012 YLR 251
• ZULFIQAR HUSSAIN v. BAMBINO (PVT) LIMITED 2012 CLD 252
• Mst. AMINA BAI v. Mrs. NAFISA ZAKARIA 2012 PLD 258

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

divorce advocates from Chakwal lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes