Find a Lawyer

SAJID HUSSAIN versus SHAH ABDUL LATIF UNIVERSITY, KHAIRPUR

Article 199 (1) (b) (ii) Introduction to Scholarship Scheme at University, Choosing a Responsible Lecturer to Stabilize Its Infrastructure, which Claims to Have a PhD Petitioner Lecturer Have chosen to give a scholarship to study. Responding lecturer to be better qualified for awarding such a scholarship challenge No quarantine written will not be a cure for anyone to continue his private grievance in such a writ public office proceeding. The scholarship award for study was not a public office because no one would have to be involved in the exercise of sovereign powers while he would study such. The writ cannot be subjected because the mere reader does not exercise any part of the sovereign power. The applicant was benefiting from the scholarship but did not disclose the fact, so he did not come to the court with a clear hand.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MUHAMMAD MURAD ALI USMANI v. State 2012 PLD 225
• ARC INTERNATIONAL through Authorized Signatory v. AHMER MANSOOR 2012 CLD 226
• MUHAMMAD RAMZAN v. PROVINCE OF SINDH through Secretary Home Department Sindh Secretariat Karachi 2012 YLR 227
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. PLASTIC PACK (PVT) LIMITED 2012 CLC 229
• Mir IFTIKHAR AHMED v. State 2012 PCrLJ 235
• SULTAN MURAD v. State 2012 MLD 235
• UNITED BANK LIMITED v. PLASTIC PACK (PVT) LIMITED 2012 CLD 239
• Mst. FARZANA v. Mst. SEHTI 2012 PLD 241

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

ask a advocate free from Hazro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes