Sections 497, Code of Conduct (XLV of 1860), Sections 364, 392, 504, 506 and 149 for kidnapping or abduction for murder, robbery, violation of peace, criminal threatening, refusal of the accused, who were the police. At the constables, it was alleged that he took the kidnapped man with him, after which he never returned, alleging that there was an unusual delay of fifteen days in filing the FIR and that No purpose was taken and even though they were entitled to guaranteed on a legal basis as per Section 7, Cr, CR, PC endorsement, kidnapping of a family member Damn, the family always tries to slope to the person that was first kidnapped and rescued him, and that such families. When abduction occurs at police stations, a delay of fifteen days by the family in filing an FIR was not beyond the norm and there can be no doubt as to why the accused kept the abduction. ? Whether or not the person intended to kill him or to hide was yet to be proven by any evidence, but, initially, some hints at the kidnapping disappeared for about six months, since The accused were dangerous and heinous criminals. Police constables had arrested a boy of tender years in a packet and forced his older men to leave, and for six months no one saw the boy nor did he. The accused was not entitled to bail even on legal grounds of delay. Dismiss accordingly \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
