Sections 4 and 5 of the Anti Terrorism Act (XXVII of 1997), Sections 6 and 7 (b), detained for possession of explosives, possessing explosives and attempting to carry out terrorism were arrested on October 3, 2002 on charges. And the alleged arms and ammunition were said to have been produced by him after a delay of 12 days from which the recovery was made so suspicious that the accused had made his case in the trial court and proved the dishonesty of the police. Was able to teach the family only lessons. , Both brothers were booked in a false case, and they showed the severity of the crime. Hand grenades, rocket launcher fuses and KK were shown capturing terrorists with 20 live bullets. The father's father succeeded in making the police forget that it was a police station, and in such cases ordinary citizens encountered it. Weapons and ammunition were not sealed on the spot and the police presented the property to the trial court in unconstitutional condition. The investigating officer also admitted in cross-examination that there were no KK numbers, in which case, the complainant. Among other contradictions, it is mentioned in the FIR and the occupation memorandum that the weapon was obtained from an open plot in front of the accused's home, but was otherwise dismissed by the advisers, which worsened the prosecution's case. Failing to prove his case on his own, the verdict resulted in 7/8 years of RI for the accused, sheer humor. And the money to kill innocent civilians prosecution failed to prove its case Hivites NGO, against the suspects, defused decision was set aside, the accused
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
