Section 17 statutory evidence (10 of 1984), Articles 137 and 138 require the payment of rent as per the personal need of the landlord and the removal of default request on the basis of personal necessity by the landlord of the landlord. Refused to belong to and the tenant's appellant (tenant) dispute. ) Was that he had purchased the cover from the landlord Validity Appellant refused to accept the court summons after filing a withdrawal request. And the matter has been postponed several times in the interest of justice. And as a result, the law was passed against the appellant speculation, under controversial order, under the testimony, Arts 137 and 138 of 1984. It was held that the appellant had no defense and that the appellant had not filed any receipt, contract or proceeding to prove his position of being a good buyer of the premises where the landlord and tenant relationship had been established on that basis. It was denied that the tenant had purchased the property. Question and that he was no longer a tenant. Then he had to evacuate the premises and file a lawsuit specifying the performance of the sales contract after which he would be given easy access to the premises appeal was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
