Section 395/324/337 H (2) Criminal Code of Conduct (V9 1898), Section 417 Robbery, Efforts to Conduct Killer AMD, Sooner or Negligence Prosecutors' Testimony, on which the Complainant relies heavily What was, he was unaware of the incident. Acknowledged that nothing was recovered from the accused and no vacancy was recovered from the scene of the incident, and admitted that the civil litigation between the parties was pending, the complainant filed an FIR against the first accused. Was dealt with in the B class. The defense witness (police officer) revealed that no trace of crime was found in any of the places, nor was he found vacant at the crime scene, and he knew that civil cases were pending between the parties in different courts. There are hearings. The court reviewed every aspect of the case and applied the basic principle of criminal jurisprudence in which the benefit of the doubt was to be given to the accused, and a weakness could be given to give such an advantage. Appeal against Breath was sufficient for a favorable hearing, dismissed
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
