Section 561A & 265K Appeal Code (XLV of 1860), Driving quickly or negligently by section 320/34 murder i kita, requesting termination of proceedings with a joint intention, section 265K before trial , Was filed under the CRPC but was denied because the truth of the prosecution's witnesses could not be ascertained without recording the evidence. He then escaped on his motorcycle at high speed and hit the suspect's driver. Of the three investigative reports, two supported the defendant's dispute, while the third report revealed that the suspect's car collided with a motorcycle and the trial was litigated by the driver. Recommended. Even if the defendant's dispute is deemed to be valid, it cannot be ignored that two youths have lost their lives in the incident. Speeding an e-motorcycle could damage the defendants' car as shown in the pictures on record, the response was not accepted by the police in the negative first investigation report presented under class C ? The magistrate, who ordered a re-investigation of the incident, was determined based on the facts and circumstances that came up during the trial after recording the evidence of the witnesses, to determine who made the mistake. The previous criminal record had nothing to do with the road accident because the robbery was a separate offense which led to the High Court of Justice in its limited jurisdiction.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
