Sections 14 and 21 of the Constitution of Pakistan Article 199 Constitution Petition Petitioner's dismissal on the grounds that the landlord is retiring from service and that the landlord has no other property for his personal facts / business. With the withdrawal request accepted. The tenant controller and the appellate court, under section 14 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance 1979, had notified the tenant that the landlord was about to retire, in the present case, within six months of the expected date of retirement. Serve. The services were served seven months and 22 days before the date of retirement, which has matured one month and 22 days ago, the notice said, adding, under the circumstances, there is no legal notice under section 14 of the Indus Rental Ordinance. And it was a legal jurisdiction. Which went to the root of the removal request. And since it was floating on the surface, it should have been noted by the courts under section 14 of the Sindh Rated Premises Ordinance, the 1979 order passed by the landlord, the order approved by the rent controller was not intact and The decision was passed by the appellate court, which was set aside. And with the removal request dismissed, the homeowner may also file a withdrawal application on such other grounds as may be available to him by law.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
