SHABBIR HUSSAIN versus EXECUTIVE DISTRICT OFFICER (EDUCATION), LARKANA
Article 199 Constitution Petitioner Applicants who applied for the Civil Service Recruitment Policy were unsuccessful candidates who applied for the positions in question but were not appointed Applicants raised the selection criteria, which were advertised in newspapers. What was given was not implemented. The criteria for selecting an employee cannot be called unfair if the selection process, in addition to numbering on the written test, gave particular importance to a candidate's academic and professional qualifications as well as the domicile space. Just because the ad did not show the full quality of the selection, as long as the selection process was transparent, fair and based on fair ranking, the court could not force an employer to adopt its recruitment policy only Do not apply because it was not fully published. The advertisement through which the application was sent to the Sete criteria for appointment and appointment provided under the recruitment policy was fair, fair and reasonable in violation of any of the criteria set forth in the policy or the outcome of the decision. The election or appointment was declared illegal by the High Court and had no legal effect. Strictly adhere to the procedure adopted by the High Court in the recruitment policy of the concerned District Recruitment Committees and prepare the revised merit list within sixty days.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
