Section 497 (2) Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Section 392/34 Police Rules, 1934, Ch 25 robberies, joint intentions, investigation bail, further investigation grant accused were arrested at different times. The question is, how far away from the scene of the incident, the police immediately went to apprehend the accused and all the articles were seized from their possession, the police were not clear, so to show their performance seemed Seems to be random. Individuals coming from random locations and made them a goat in the FIR, no independent adviser was taken, which is a violation of Section 103, CCPC prosecution admitted when recovered from that place. When it comes to sealing items, there was a violation of the law. Where the suspects were arrested and their de-sealing at the police station, the possibility of applying such articles to the accused could not be excluded. Identity wasn't paraded before. The e-magistrate and, instead, the police station, which had no significance and raised suspicion that further investigation into the accused's case was needed and accordingly they were extended on bail.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
