Sections 302/149 and 337F (ii) Appreciating the evidence of felony murder, illegal assembly, ordinary objects and anyone causing "neglect", the defendant's lawyer has requested that the FI be issued within 11 hours of the incident. The R was entered. And the fact that the counselors indicated that the FIR was lodged after the interrogation is due to the fact that some inquiries were made before the recording of the FIR; they stood alone, not enough to come to that conclusion. That the incident could not have been held to create such a situation as was allegedly the case. Small tentacles of prosecutorial story. And overall the impact was to be assessed in light of other evidence The charges against the accused in the FIR were that he was one of 9 people and was armed with a shotgun and said that the accused had shot at the injured person. Fired at the gun that affected him. The right-hand man who cried and fell down was not alleged to have repeated his firearm and evidence shows that the accused, who was armed with hatchets and sticks, was injured. It was not proved that the accused had participated in the murder of the victim. No evidence was brought to the accused before the incident. Before the incident, the decision to murder the victim was taken. And the suspect was part of the conspiracy. The fact is that the accused was with those who went to kill the victim, not him. It is enough to accuse him of murder and he knew that under Section 302 the crime against the accused was to be committed, the PPC was not proved against the accused. Irresistible and inconsistent
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
