Find a Lawyer

GHULAM MUHAMAMD versus MRS. MUSTAFA KAZMIE

On the basis of the default in the payment of rent of Sections 17 and 24, the tenant's removal on the basis of the Tenant (Appellant) order for his removal from the premises under the Challenge Order of the Controller of Rent that he should order monthly rent submission. Failure to comply with. Violations and rents were submitted after the rent controller's due date. Such a common breach occurred in the sense of recovery default and cannot be considered a technical default, as the tenant default claimed by the landlord and even the tenant itself. In preparation of the receipts contained in the record, the High Court, rejecting the tenant's appeal, directed the tenant to give the landlord possession of the land within a period of 45 days.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012

• MANTHAR v. State 2012 PCrLJ 1263
• MICHAEL v. State 2012 YLR 1268
• SAFEHAVEN MARINE LTD., IRELAND v. KARACHI PORT TRUST 2012 CLD 1269
• AMEER BUKHSH v. State 2012 YLR 1271
• ARSHAD NASEEMUDDIN AHMED v. JAVED BALOCH 2012 CLC 1293
• Syed QASIM HASSAN v. Syed MEHDI HASSAN 2012 YLR 1294
• GAJI alias DODO v. State 2012 MLD 1298
• SONERI BANK LIMITED v. COMPASS TRADING CORPORATION (PVT.) LIMITED 2012 CLD 1302

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2012 →

female advocates from Bhakkar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes