Appeal to Article 121 and Article 151 Intra-Court Appeal 113 2009 On the mere expulsion of obtaining a certified copy of the unidentified order, the appellant applied for such certified copy on 19 11 2009, and the copyist filed his The cost was estimated on 25 1 2010, and the appellant paid 29 at the same price. On appeal of the respondents of 2010 1 and 3 2 2010, the appellant submitted that he was responsible for the delay in estimating the cost, due to the failure of the appellant to proceed with the issue of copyright. The cost estimate was within the power and power of the authority. The relevant copyright, and the appellant, had neither the role nor the option to estimate the cost. The time taken by the copy in estimating the cost cannot be attributed to the appellant, but will be excluded from the time of filing the appeal. There is no time limit in the circumstances. \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2012
