Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN ARSHAD versus VICE-CHANCELLOR B.Z.U., MULTAN

Students with Arts 25 and 199 MBA students from the Bahauddin Zakaria University Validity Petition for Admission, discrimination in relation to the previous and subsequent grading system for calculation of the overall grade point average (CGPA), such as He was fully aware of the grading system and accepted the result without completing his MBA course without taking any objections and reservations. Discrimination can always be applied to such hired persons, but not to the applicant. In this case no one was given any additional benefit from the existing grading system and it was the former and Subsequent sessions for which the rules were revised The offer of discrimination for the applicant was not available nor any of the applicant's rights were violated nor any jurisdictional defect was identified That caused the request to be removed \ r \ n

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SAHIWAL 2015 YLR 316
• JAMSHED IQBAL BUTT v. Mst. BUSHRA TUFAIL 2015 CLC 316
• HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, BAHAWALPUR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLD 317
• GHULAM YASEEN v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2015 CLD 320
• MUSTANSIR HUSSAIN v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2015 PLC(CS) 323
• Pir MUHAMMAD SHAH KHAGGA v. DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER NA-164, PAKPATTAN 2015 CLC 329
• Mst. BUSHRA BIBI v. Mst. NASIM BIBI 2015 MLD 335
• MARIAM BIBI through Abida Parveen v. NASEER AHMAD 2015 PLD 336

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

attorney vs advocate vs counsel from Patoki lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes