Find a Lawyer

GHULAM YASEEN versus NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN

Sections 19 (1) (7) and 27 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), A XXI, R 66 Suite Property Auction Banking Court ordered the reserve price reduction and the order was executed, Banking court, plea of auction court dismisses request for objection to reduced reserve price The plaintiff claimed that the banking court did not have the power to review its decision; the plaintiff did not appear in the banking court despite the notice being issued. The defendant neither challenged nor determined the reserve price of the property for auction, did not come within the scope of the reserve price reduction review or withdrawal of the order; Did not affect the rights of

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• ASHIQ HUSSAIN alias IRSHAD alias SHAAD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 313
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SAHIWAL 2015 YLR 316
• JAMSHED IQBAL BUTT v. Mst. BUSHRA TUFAIL 2015 CLC 316
• HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, BAHAWALPUR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLD 317
• MUHAMMAD USMAN ARSHAD v. VICE-CHANCELLOR B.Z.U., MULTAN 2015 MLD 320
• MUSTANSIR HUSSAIN v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2015 PLC(CS) 323
• Pir MUHAMMAD SHAH KHAGGA v. DISTRICT RETURNING OFFICER NA-164, PAKPATTAN 2015 CLC 329
• Mst. BUSHRA BIBI v. Mst. NASIM BIBI 2015 MLD 335

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

lawer from fb area from Chishtian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes