Find a Lawyer

JAMSHED IQBAL BUTT versus MST. BUSHRA TUFAIL

O. IX, R 4 Specific Relief Act (I of 1877), section 42 suit, maintenance of suit for filing arguments on miscellaneous application not scheduled for hearing due to lack of presence of the plaintiff, on which the very miscellaneous The plea required to present the evidence could be excluded because the date for the trial was not set, therefore, the order to dismiss the case for illegal prosecution was not legally binding and the hearing was set for trial. The order was not rejected on the due date. , The question on the limit became irrelevant

Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015

• Mian MUHAMMAD ALI v. CCPO 2015 PLD 313
• COMMISSIONER INLAND REVENUE v. GUL ENTERPRISES 2015 PTD 313
• ASHIQ HUSSAIN alias IRSHAD alias SHAAD v. State 2015 PCrLJ 313
• MUHAMMAD AMIN v. JUDGE, FAMILY COURT, SAHIWAL 2015 YLR 316
• HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION, BAHAWALPUR v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2015 PLD 317
• GHULAM YASEEN v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2015 CLD 320
• MUHAMMAD USMAN ARSHAD v. VICE-CHANCELLOR B.Z.U., MULTAN 2015 MLD 320
• MUSTANSIR HUSSAIN v. DISTRICT COORDINATION OFFICER, BAHAWALPUR 2015 PLC(CS) 323

All Lahore High Court Lahore judgments of 2015 →

top civil advocates from Swabi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes