Section 12 For specific performance litigation, the trial court's special performance case for selling an arbitration lawyer's solicitation case was filed, which was ruled from time to time when a person made an oral claim in court. He was required to appear in court to do so. Specifically request it with all the details, there was no document, in the present case, ordering specific performance was arbitrary relief which would convince the courts that an agreement had been reached and the plaintiff also had doubts. Without having to prove it. There was no payment receipt, nor was the name of a witness mentioned in the Plaintiff where no oral date, place and time of the contract was requested in the oral agreement and the witness's name was not mentioned in the claimant. Yes, such matters were extraordinary statements of the plaintiff and his testimony contradicts the payment of consideration and consensus reached between the parties. The payment in the suit for the specific performance was the most important part of the agreement and the evidence at that location. The hollow and contradictory courts were mistaken, while ignoring the contradictory evidence available on the record. Collection records the words were not sustainable. Under the law, the two courts together revised the recordings of the results, which accepted the review, and the decisions were dismissed and the injunctions were set aside and the case with costs. Was deleted
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
