Appreciating the evidence in section 2302 (b), the witnesses of interest and opportunity were sent to trial for three persons, the accused was sentenced by the trial court and sentenced to life imprisonment, while the same witnesses On the evidence of the two co-accused, the investigating officer confirmed the presence of shopkeepers operating at the scene of the incident but did not record any of the shopkeepers' statement under Section 161, CR PC. The witness could not be called, but they were both witnesses of the occasion and confirmed their presence at any time by any independent means or Unconfirmed Both eyewitnesses were relevant and interested witnesses and such fact was acknowledged by the complainant, the credibility, authenticity and truthfulness of such witnesses were not able to be relied upon. The presence of both witnesses on the scene was suspicious and their B-Train Court correctly denied that on the same set of evidence, the trial court acquitted the two co-accused and based on the same evidence, the trial court convicted the accused. The target cannot be targeted and the High Court has taken the suspect into account and set aside the punishment and punishment. He was acquitted by the trial court, as a result, he was allowed to appeal under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
