Sections 302 (b), 324 and 34 Qutl-Am, Qutel MMD's attempt to compel, the motive of appreciating the joint intention evidence, the complainant improved his statement while appearing before the court that the prosecution Evidence of the complainant's reliability improved by the complainant to strengthen the case, maintaining the conviction of the accused on the capital charge was not safe, saying that the evidence was refused to be considered, The injured witness of the prosecution was an independent witness who had nothing to do with the complainant, nor is there any enmity with the accused's presence. With regard to the injured witness, no imagination could be doubted on the occasion, which was accepted by the defense and the collar account was sufficiently accepted with the help of medical evidence, the prosecution proved the motive behind the incident. Failed to do, the parties were the same residents. The village, and the circumstances, suggested that something else had happened before the incident, which had not been brought to the record, recovered the pistol 30 bore on the suspect's report, did not advance the prosecution's case, because of the incident. There was no crime on the spot, it was said that the pistol was not sent to the office of the forensic science laboratory. It has been stated to confirm its practical condition that the alleged retrieval of the pistol could not seek any help against the accused if the accused failed to prove the defense's request if both versions, namely the prosecution's story and defense. If the application is kept precise, the prosecution's story may be more likely. , And the color of truth raised directly and confidently against the accused
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
