MUHAMMAD BAKHSH (DECEASED) versus AMANULLAH (DECEASED)
Section 42 Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), Section 11 Suite Declaration for Justice, Applicable Justice Dignity Principle, Scope Suit's doctrine was upheld by the trial court, but the appellate court again applied the principle of judicial justification. Was deleted The defendants were involved in a previous proceeding which was with the claimants claiming interest in the suit property. The plaintiff's case was one of the plaintiffs in the first period of litigation that applied not only between the parties but also between the parties. On the other hand, the co-plaintiffs and the co-defendants will have to consider the final decision on the issue of whether the principle of Race Judasta was applicable or not. Conflict interest was the most important and important component of the application of the principle of direct justice to both direct and consequent litigation. Defendants had a separate right but the finding of relief was one and the interests of the parties were not disputed. In the present court, the principle of Race Judesta was not attracted. Bald's statement entitled the party's competence and defendants. It would not be enough to decide that ultimately the doctrine of doctrine was another basis for the defendant's instability, which was rejected in the case of review.
Related judgments — Lahore High Court Lahore, 2015
